Seven legal verticals. One operating system.
We run paid media exclusively for the legal industry — and inside legal, the architecture changes meaningfully by practice area. Personal injury isn't probate isn't investment fraud isn't family law. CPL benchmarks differ. Qualifying questions differ. Jurisdiction rules differ. Intake cadence differs. The channel mix that produces signed cases differs. What stays constant is the operating system underneath: signed-case rate (or fundable-lead rate, in the funding vertical) as the scoreboard, lead forms that do the qualifying work, accounts owned by you, weekly written briefs from a real person, and month-to-month contracts. The parameters change vertical to vertical. Below is the index — pick yours.
PI ≠ Probate.
Probate ≠ Investment Fraud.
Generic agencies treat them the same.
Every legal vertical has its own search-intent map, its own qualifying questions, its own jurisdiction rules, its own conversion windows, and its own channel mix that actually produces signed cases. The agency running "PPC for lawyers" with the same playbook for personal injury, divorce, and probate is overpaying on at least two of those — and probably all three.
Intent is vertical-specific.
A PI prospect is searching post-accident with urgency, often from a hospital bed. A probate prospect is searching post-bereavement at slower cadence. An investment-fraud prospect doesn't search Google at all — they scroll Facebook after a news story about their broker. Same agency, same playbook, three completely different acquisition surfaces.
Qualification thresholds change everything.
Investment fraud disqualifies below $100K–$250K losses. PI disqualifies on at-fault. Family law disqualifies on jurisdiction. Business law disqualifies on company size. Each vertical's lead form is a different intake form — and an agency that ships the same three-field magnet to all of them will flood every intake team with leads that can't be signed.
The channel mix isn't transferable.
PI runs LSA-led with Meta as the conversion surface. Investment fraud runs PPC-led with Meta as awareness because LSA categories don't cover securities work. Probate is LSA-dominant. Family law splits PPC by positioning (affordable vs premium). Business law leans long-tail PPC + LSA. The agency that says "we do LSA + PPC + Meta for everyone" is recommending the wrong mix for at least five of the seven.
"The operating system is the same — signed-case rate as the scoreboard, lead forms that qualify, weekly briefs, no contracts. The parameters are what change. The question we'll answer on the call: what are your parameters."
Pick your practice area.
Read the full vertical playbook.
Each card below links to a dedicated landing page with the system, the anchor case study, the channel mix, the pricing, and the FAQs specific to that vertical. The operating system is shared. The parameters aren't.
Auto, slip-and-fall, premises, motorcycle, MVA. Post-accident urgency, hospital-bed prospects, $50K–$80K+ ad spend per month at scale. LSA carries the volume, Meta surfaces the unaware prospect, PPC covers long-tail intent. Reviews are the ad-rank flywheel.
Stockbroker fraud, FINRA arbitration, Ponzi recovery, broker-name targeting. National audience, narrow auction, regulated ad approval. Loss-threshold qualification at the form is non-negotiable — most agencies don't even know that's a setting.
DUI, federal crimes, DV, white-collar. High-velocity intake, hours-not-days turnaround on consultation booking, jurisdiction-strict targeting. Federal-vs-state separation matters at the campaign level — they're different audiences with different intent.
Probate admin, deeds, guardianship, estate planning, probate litigation. Slow-burn cycle, bereaved callers, operational intake matters more than ad-tech tricks. Multi-service practices need category-by-category bid management — one "probate attorney" bid doesn't cut it.
Divorce, custody, prenups, separations. The wedge isn't keyword choice — it's positioning-matched bid strategy. Affordable-alternative firms need volume velocity; premium-consultation firms need tighter qualification. Same vertical, two completely different campaign architectures.
Formation, contracts, M&A, commercial litigation, IP, employment. Research-phase prospects, multiple stakeholders, deal-size sensitivity. Sub-niche campaigns (M&A vs commercial litigation vs employment) outperform a single "business attorney" account by a wide margin.
Pre-settlement funding, lawsuit loans, attorney funding. The scoreboard isn't CPL — it's fundable-lead rate. Case-type filtering is everything (no workers' comp, no class actions, no pre-litigation). State compliance is non-negotiable. Multi-brand operators need separated tracking from day one.
If your practice area isn't one of the seven above, two possibilities: we can run it under one of the adjacent playbooks (medical malpractice fits PI with modifications; IP litigation fits business law; immigration overlaps with criminal defense in places), or we'll be honest it's not a fit. Mass tort, class action, and bankruptcy are three we currently decline because the acquisition economics work differently.
Seven verticals.
One operating system.
The parameters change vertical to vertical — channel mix, qualifying thresholds, CPL benchmarks, intake cadence. The operating system underneath stays the same. Six layers that run identically whether you're a PI firm in Orlando or a probate practice in Denver. The disciplines below are why every vertical-specific landing page on this site reads from the same playbook.
What changes vertical to vertical is detailed on each practice-area page above.
Signed-case rate (or fundable-lead rate) as the scoreboard
CPL is the input. Every campaign we run is graded on cost-per-signed-case — or, in the funding vertical, cost-per-fundable-lead. We won't optimize against vanity volume metrics. Reporting reflects this from day one: signed-case (or fundable-lead) attribution is the headline metric on every weekly brief and every monthly review.
Lead forms that do the qualifying work
Every vertical's lead form is built like an intake form. Conditional logic, qualification thresholds, jurisdiction checks, SMS verification, case-type screening. The parameters change (IF gets loss thresholds, PI gets at-fault routing, probate gets jurisdiction, business law gets company-size filters) but the discipline is consistent.
Accounts owned by you · day one
Google Ads, Google Local Services, Meta Business Manager, GA4, GTM container, HubSpot — all of it lives in your name from the day we onboard. We're added as managers, never owners. If we ever part ways, you walk away with every campaign, every audience, every dashboard, every historical data point.
Vertical-appropriate channel mix
PI runs LSA + Meta + PPC. IF runs PPC + Meta. Probate runs LSA-led. Family law runs PPC tuned to positioning. Business law runs PPC + LSA with sub-niche carve-outs. Legal funding runs PPC-only with multi-brand orchestration. The mix isn't transferable — the discipline of choosing it is. We won't recommend channels you don't need.
Intake-aware optimization
HubSpot lead-quality tags within 24–48 hours of capture feed back into the next week's bid, geo, and category decisions. Bad leads shrink at the source over time, not get disputed after the fact. Every vertical's intake team is part of the feedback loop — the campaign gets smarter month over month.
Weekly written briefs, monthly strategy
Every week, a real person writes you a paragraph explaining what moved and why — broken down by channel, by campaign, by signed-case attribution. Every month, a 30-minute strategy review on the only metric that matters for your vertical. No automated reports, no PDF screenshots, no Looker Studio in lieu of analysis.
Numbers from the portfolio.
One per vertical.
One headline metric per vertical — the cleanest, most-recent number we can point to publicly. Each receipt links into the full case study on that vertical's page.
A different posture on your account.
Simple. Transparent.
No "plus a percent" games.
You're on one plan or the other. Never both. No per-channel surcharges. No mystery line items in month three.
- One channel: PPC, LSA, or Meta
- Up to $10K/month ad budget
- Case-type filtering at keyword / form level
- State-targeting tied to your licensing
- GTM, CallRail & HubSpot integration
- Weekly & monthly written reports
- Real-time AgencyAnalytics dashboard
- All channels: PPC + LSA + Meta, orchestrated
- $10K/month per channel ($15K min for 2)
- Everything in Starter, plus —
- Single-account multi-brand architecture
- Signed-case feedback signal to Google / Meta
- Intake quality monitoring & call reviews
- Slack access for priority response
- Founder-led account stewardship
Most managing partners ask at least three of these on the intake call.
Pulled directly from intake calls with the founder. If yours isn't here, it'll get answered live.
Why legal-only? Wouldn't a generalist agency have broader expertise?
Legal verticals don't transfer well from other industries. The acquisition surface for personal injury (LSA-dominated, review-driven, urgent-intent) shares almost nothing with the acquisition surface for B2B SaaS or e-commerce. The qualifying questions for investment fraud (loss thresholds, jurisdiction, broker name) don't apply anywhere else. The compliance work for legal funding (state-by-state operating rules) is unique to the vertical. An agency running 90% non-legal accounts will be using legal as the test bed for their generalist playbook — and your CPL pays for the learning. Specialization is the entire point of the cost structure on this site.
What if my practice area isn't one of the seven you list?
If you're a legal practice and your vertical isn't listed, two possibilities: (1) we can work with you under one of the adjacent playbooks — e.g., medical malpractice fits the PI system with modifications, IP litigation fits the business-law system, immigration fits the criminal-defense system in some respects — or (2) we'll be honest that the vertical isn't a fit and decline. Mass tort, class action, and bankruptcy are three legal sub-verticals we currently don't take on because the acquisition economics work differently. The intake call will sort it.
Can you run multiple practice areas for the same firm?
Yes. Multi-practice firms (PI + criminal defense, family law + business law, probate + estate planning, etc.) are common, and the operating system handles them. The work is in practice-area-specific campaign architecture: separate Google Ads campaigns by vertical, separate LSA categories tuned per practice, separate lead forms with their own qualifying logic, separate signed-case attribution by case type. The Growth plan covers multiple practice areas under one 20% fee — no per-practice surcharges.
How do you handle multi-state or multi-office firms?
State-by-state targeting tied to your bar admissions, with explicit exclusions on everything else. Multi-office firms get per-office tracking (Boyle & Jasari runs LSA in DC and Philadelphia with separate reporting; Gibson runs Orlando and Houston). For multi-brand operators (most common in legal funding — Tribeca and MayFair run as separate consumer-facing brands inside one operator), we handle account architecture, attribution split, and creative separation. Migration timeline is the same: 30 days' notice to current vendor, day 31 we go live, no double-spend month.
What's the minimum spend to make this work?
Starter plan covers one channel at up to $10K/month ad budget — that's $1,800/month plus the ad spend itself. Below ~$5K/month in ad spend on any single channel, the algorithms (Google, Meta) don't get enough data to optimize meaningfully and you'll burn the first 60 days in learning phase. Verticals with naturally lower CPL (family law affordable models, business law, legal funding) can work at the lower end of the Starter plan. PI and IF typically need $10K+/month in ad spend per channel to produce signed-case volume that's measurable inside a quarter.
How quickly can a new vertical be live?
Depends on the channel. Google PPC: 7–14 business days from contract to first live spend. Meta: 10–14 business days (sometimes longer if Meta's legal-vertical review adds review days). LSA: bottleneck is Google's verification timeline (typically 2–4 weeks for license, insurance, background check). For multi-channel rollouts we sequence them so the fastest channel is live in week 2, with the others phased over the following weeks. Account ownership transfers happen day one regardless.
What's the contract structure?
Month-to-month, always. No 12-month lockups, no cancellation fees, no per-channel surcharges, no "plus a percent" games. You're on the Starter plan or the Growth plan — one or the other, never both. When your spend crosses $10K/month or you add a second channel/brand, you move to Growth. That's the only structural change. Accounts are always in your name. You leave with everything if you leave.
How do I pick which vertical landing page to read?
If you're a managing partner reading this page, you already know your practice area — click the card above. If you're a multi-practice firm, start with your primary revenue practice (the one that pays the bills) and read that vertical's full system. We'll cover the other practice areas on the intake call. If you're not sure whether your vertical is one of the seven we serve, book a strategy call and we'll either point you to the closest fit or say no honestly on the call.
Pick your practice area.
Talk to the founder.
30 minutes. No deck. We'll look at your last 90 days of leads, what percentage your intake team signed, your current channel mix, your lead-form qualification logic, and your spend — calibrated against the vertical-specific benchmarks above — and tell you, honestly, what we'd shift and whether we'd take you on.
Book a 30-min strategy call →